rkh.sePublications from Swedish Red Cross University
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
First and second cycle nursing students' perceptions of the clinical learning environment in acute care settings - A comparative crossectional study using the CLES+T scale
The Swedish Red Cross University College, Department of Health Sciences. Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Nurse Education Today, ISSN 0260-6917, E-ISSN 1532-2793, Vol. 108, article id 105211Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that the clinical learning environment can both facilitate and hinder students' learning. Students' perceptions need to be evaluated, preferably using nationally and internationally validated instruments. In Sweden, there is a lack of research about students' evaluation in acute care settings and from the perspectives of different levels of students.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to explore and compare perceptions of the clinical learning environment of first- and second-cycle nursing students in an acute care setting using the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher scale (CLES+T).

DESIGN: The design involves cross-sectional data collection with comparisons between groups.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from a convenience sample of first- and second-cycle students at the end of their clinical placements in an acute care setting at a university hospital.

METHODS: A paper version and a web version of the culturally adapted version of CLES+T was filled out by the students. An independent t-test was used to explore the differences between CLES+T scores and distribution methods and educational level. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS: Overall, the students (N = 179) were satisfied with the clinical learning environment. There was no significant difference in the total score (m = 4.31, SD = 0.63) between first- and second-cycle students except for the subscale of "Premises of nursing on the ward" and the individual items "The ward's nursing philosophy was clearly defined" and "Patients received individual nursing care", showing that the first-cycle students were more satisfied compared to the second-cycle students. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.97 vs. 0.96) for the paper survey and the web survey, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide initial support for the CLES+T as a useful instrument to evaluate the clinical learning environment at different levels of education and in different contexts regardless of distribution method.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 108, article id 105211
Keywords [en]
Clinical learning environment, Evaluation scale, First-cycle nursing student, Second-cycle nursing student, Supervision
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:rkh:diva-4155DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105211ISI: 000724919500020PubMedID: 34784564OAI: oai:DiVA.org:rkh-4155DiVA, id: diva2:1614445
Available from: 2021-11-25 Created: 2021-11-25 Last updated: 2021-12-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Manninen, Katri

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Manninen, Katri
By organisation
Department of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Nurse Education Today
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 221 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf