Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Estimating the burden of early onset dementia: systematic review of disease prevalence
Department of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munchen, Germany.
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: European Journal of Neurology, ISSN 1351-5101, E-ISSN 1468-1331, Vol. 21, no 4, 563-569 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Dementia is more common in older age but a number of people develop symptoms at a younger age and are said to have early onset dementia (EOD). Those with EOD face different challenges to those with onset later in life. It has been difficult to quantify this disease burden. This is a systematic review of papers reporting on the prevalence of EOD. A search of Medline and Embase was performed. This was followed by a hand search of the references of these papers. Eleven suitable studies were included. All of the data was from more economically developed countries. The studies were heterogeneous in their design hindering direct comparison. The majority of the papers looked at all types of dementia although many gave a breakdown of the prevalence of different subgroups. A variety of diagnostic criteria was employed. Figures of 38 to 260 per 100 000 are quoted by papers looking at various different types of dementia together with an onset of between 30 and 64 or up to 420 per 100 000 for those aged 55–64. Prevalence rises as age approaches 65. Epidemiological data for prevalence rates for EOD are sparse. EOD remains a rare condition with low case numbers. Assimilation and comparison of results from existing studies is difficult due to methodological heterogeneity. Cross-national standardization of methodology should be a priority for future research in this area.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Vol. 21, no 4, 563-569 p.
Keyword [en]
Alzheimer's dementia, early onset dementia, pre-senile dementia, prevalence
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:rkh:diva-807DOI: 10.1111/ene.12325PubMedID: 24418291OAI: oai:DiVA.org:rkh-807DiVA: diva2:712562
Available from: 2014-04-15 Created: 2014-04-15 Last updated: 2016-04-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
von Strauss, Eva
In the same journal
European Journal of Neurology
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 62 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf