Purpose: Although sexual minorities are consistently found to be at excess risk of poor mental health, less is known about the mental health of individuals with dual minority statuses based on sexual orientation and migration background. This study aimed to examine prevalence of and disparities in mental health symptoms and treatment for common mental disorders (CMD) among sexual minority migrants; and to explore the potential mediating role of interpersonal and social stress.

Methods: Participants were drawn from the Swedish Public Health Survey, 2018. The analytic sample included 104,652 individuals with complete records on all study variables (37.1%). The survey assessed mental health symptoms and interpersonal and social stress and was complemented with information on psychiatric treatment from comprehensive nationwide registries. Using logistic regression and mediation analyses, six groups were compared based on sexual orientation and migration background.

Results: Greater risk of mental health symptoms was found among Swedish-born and non-European sexual minorities (adjusted odds ratios (OR) = 2.20, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.89-2.57, and OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.34-3.29, respectively) compared to Swedish-born heterosexuals. Swedish-born sexual minorities were at greater risk of receiving treatment for CMD (OR = 2.58, 95% CI 2.20-3.01), while non-European heterosexuals showed lower risk (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.52-0.72). Perceived discrimination was less common among non-European sexual minorities compared to their Swedish-born counterparts and partially mediated the association between migration background and mental health symptoms.

Conclusions: Sexual minority migrants are at greater risk of mental health symptoms compared to Swedish-born heterosexuals but not compared to Swedish-born sexual minorities. Providing mental health care for sexual minorities, including sexual minority migrants, and targeting sexual orientation discrimination, should be a priority.

Introduction: Despite increasing numbers of working-age cancer survivors, evidence on their future work-related circumstances is limited. This study examined their future sick leave, disability pension, and unemployment benefits compared to matched cancer-free individuals.

Methods: A matched cohort study was conducted using nationwide Swedish registers. In total, 94,411 individuals aged 25 to 59 years when diagnosed with incident cancer in 2001–2012 and who returned to work after cancer were compared with their matched cancer-free individuals (N = 354,814). Follow-up started from the year before cancer diagnosis and continued up to 14 years. Generalized estimating equations were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR) and odds ratios for the difference between cancer survivors and matched cancer-free individuals.

Results: Compared with cancer-free individuals, cancer survivors had six times higher sick-leave days per year after cancer (IRR 6.25 [95% CI, 5.97–6.54] for men; IRR, 5.51 [5.39–5.64] for women). This higher number of sick-leave days declined over time but a two-fold difference persisted. An approximate 1.5 times higher risk of receiving disability pension remained during follow-up. The unemployment days tended to be lower for cancer survivors (IRR, 0.84 [0.75–0.94] for men; IRR, 0.91 [0.86–0.96] for women). Risk of sick leave and disability pension was higher among those with leukemia, colorectal, and breast cancer than skin and genitourinary cancers.

Conclusions: Cancer survivors who returned to work experienced a high and persisting sick leave and disability pension for over a decade. Prolonged receipt of a high amount of benefits may have long-term adverse impacts on financial circumstances; more knowledge to promote the environment that encourages returning to and remaining in work is needed.

Refugees and asylum seekers face an increased risk of poor mental health, and evidence shows that housing in the post-migration context plays a crucial role in shaping their mental well-being. Research also suggests that institutional accommodations during the asylum process might be more detrimental to their mental health compared to private accommodations. We aimed to prospectively estimate the associations between housing type during the asylum process (institutional or self-organized accommodations) and healthcare utilization for common mental disorders (CMDs) after being granted a residence permit as a refugee in Sweden. This register-based cohort study includes all asylum seekers aged 18–60 who were granted residence permits in Sweden between 2010 and 2012, totaling 20,396 individuals, of whom 11,694 resided in self-organized housing (EBO) and 8,702 in accommodation centers (ABO). Using a generalized estimating equation (GEE), we estimated the associations between housing type (ABO or EBO) and prescriptions for antidepressants or anxiolytic medication, as well as specialized in- and outpatient visits with a diagnosis of CMDs, over a five-year follow-up period after being granted a residence permit. The adjusted odds ratio (controlled for sociodemographic factors) showed that those who had lived in ABO, compared with EBO, had a greater risk of any antidepressant or anxiolytic prescriptions (OR = 1.32, [1.21–1.44]) as well as any specialized in- or outpatient visits with a CMD diagnosis (OR = 1.41 [1.27–1.52]). Our results demonstrate that former asylum seekers who have lived in institutional housing use more mental healthcare services than those who have lived in self-organized housing, even when potential sociodemographic confounders and mediators are adjusted for. These associations persisted for up to five years after they had received a residence permit, highlighting that when asylum seekers live in institutional housing it is especially important to discuss how health can be promoted during the asylum-seeking period.

Denna rapport beskriver en ny form av traumabehandling som testats vid Röda Korsets behandlingscenter för krigsskadade och torterade i Uppsala. Behandlingen ges i intensivt format under fem heldagar och använder en kombination av två välbeforskade traumabehandlingsmetoder, Prolonged Exposure (PE) och Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), tillsammans med fysisk aktivitet och musikterapeutiska interventioner. Den kvantitativa utvärderingen av projektet visade att intensivbehandling hade stor effekt på minskning av PTSD-symtom. Den kvalitativa utvärderingen bestod av intervjuer med patienter samt gruppintervjuer med behandlare. Intervjuerna visade på att behandlingen var uppskattad av både patienter och behandlare och upplevdes som genomförbar, effektiv och säker.

This report describes a new form of trauma treatment tested at the Swedish Red Cross Treatment Centres for Persons Affected by War and Torture, in Uppsala, Sweden. The treatment is delivered in an intensive format over five full days and uses a combination of two well-researched trauma treatment methods, Prolonged Exposure (PE) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), along with physical activity and music therapy interventions. The quantitative evaluation of the project showed that the intensive treatment had a significant effect on reducing PTSD symptoms. The qualitative evaluation consisted of interviews with patients and group interviews with therapists. The interviews indicated that the treatment was appreciated by both patients and therapists and was perceived as feasible, effective, and safe.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has made visible the scale of health disparities in society, highlighting how the distribution of infection and deaths differs between population subgroups within countries. Asylum seekers represent a potentially vulnerable group; early in the pandemic, concerns were raised about their housing situation, usually involving overcrowded, camp-like accommodations, and the effects of COVID-19 in relation to this. Hence, this study aimed to explore asylum seekers' experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic while living at accommodation centers. Methods: In this qualitative study, 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted with asylum seekers at two accommodation centers in Sweden. Participants represented a diverse group of asylum seekers in regard to age, educational background, and gender. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Experiences related to COVID-19 were highly dependent on the living situation at the accommodation centers and the experience of feeling unsafe in shared spaces. This was enhanced by the experiences of a challenging mix of COVID-19 messages where different understandings of COVID-19 and related measures existed, together with a feeling of loss of control and safety in shared rooms. Additionally, participants felt more isolated from the outside society and missed prior social activities. Adding to this experience of isolation was an increasing mistrust regarding the authorities' pandemic response. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of understanding the specific challenges and vulnerabilities of asylum seekers at accommodation centers during the pandemic, shaped by their housing situation and legal status. The findings underscore the need for context-specific support, holistic disease prevention approaches, and tailored health communication strategies using diverse formats. Additionally, the findings emphasize the crucial need to identify and mobilize existing community resources in planning and implementing pandemic control measures. Furthermore, the study emphasizes governmental responsibility in providing secure housing, and to address long-term vulnerabilities beyond pandemics.

Background and objective: Population-based estimates of the socioeconomic burden of multiple sclerosis (MS) are limited, especially regarding primary healthcare. This study aimed to estimate the excess costs of people with MS that could be attributed to their MS, including primary healthcare.

Methods: An observational study was conducted of the 2806 working-aged people with MS in Stockholm, Sweden and 28,060 propensity score matched references without MS. Register-based resource use was quantified for 2018. Annual healthcare costs (primary, specialised outpatient, and inpatient healthcare visits along with prescribed drugs) and productivity losses (operationalised by sickness absence and disability pension days) were quantified using bottom-up costing. The costs of people with MS were compared with those of the references using independent t-tests with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to isolate the excess costs of MS from the mean difference.

Results: The mean annual excess costs of MS for healthcare were €7381 (95% CI 6991–7816) per person with MS with disease-modifying therapies as the largest component (€4262, 95% CI 4026–4497). There was a mean annual excess cost for primary healthcare of €695 (95% CI 585–832) per person with MS, comprising 9.4% of the excess healthcare costs of MS. The mean annual excess costs of MS for productivity losses were €13,173 (95% CI 12,325–14,019) per person with MS, predominately from disability pension (79.3%).

Conclusions: The socioeconomic burden of MS in Sweden from healthcare consumption and productivity losses was quantified, updating knowledge on the cost structure of the substantial excess costs of MS.

Background: Forced migrants fleeing conflict and violence face a high risk of mental health problems due to experiences before displacement, perilous journeys, and conditions in the new host societies. Asylum seekers seem to be in particularly vulnerable situations, indicated by higher prevalence rates of mental health problems compared to resettled refugees. Asylum seekers’ mental health is highly influenced by the conditions they face in host countries while awaiting a decision on their case. In Sweden, 40% of asylum seekers reside in state-provided accommodation centers during the asylum process. Collective accommodation centers for asylum seekers have been said to impose restrictive social conditions and to be associated with poorer mental health outcomes than other housing forms (e.g., self-organized housing). However, there seems to be a scarcity of qualitative studies exploring the experiences of asylum seekers in different contexts. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the experiences of asylum seekers and how they manage their mental wellbeing while living at accommodation centers in Sweden.

Methods: Fourteen semi-structured interviews with asylum seekers were conducted at two accommodation centers in Sweden. Participants were recruited using purposeful sampling and represented a diverse group of asylum seekers regarding age, background, and gender. The data was analyzed using content analysis.

Results: Three overarching categories were identified; 1) Frozen life, 2) Constant worrying and “overthinking”, and 3) Distractions and peer support. Participants experienced a state of being that could be characterized as a frozen life, which was associated with intense feelings of psychological distress, mostly described as manifesting itself in consuming patterns of ruminative thoughts, for instance overthinking and constant worrying. However, despite high levels of distress, participants demonstrated agency in managing negative mental health outcomes through self-care practices, peer support, and the development of care practices in caring for others in need.

Conclusion: This study offers new insights into the everyday challenges that asylum seekers at accommodation centers face. Furthermore, it offers valuable observations of how asylum seekers at accommodation centers cope through self-care practices, peer support, and care practices in caring for peers in need. In order to enable sustainable and empowering support, mental health and psychosocial support services must identify and address both challenges and strengths, be grounded in the lived reality of asylum seekers, and build on existing resources. Moreover, further policy work needs to be done to enable faster asylum processes.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease associated with increased healthcare utilisation and productivity losses.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the progression of healthcare costs and productivity losses before and after diagnosis of MS in comparison to that of a population-based matched reference group.

METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, Swedish register-based cohort study of working-aged people with MS diagnosed in 2010-12 (n = 1988) and population-based matched references without MS (n = 7981). Nine years of observation spanned from 4 years prior (Y_-4) to 4 years (Y₊₄) after the year of diagnosis (Y₀). Differences in annual all-cause healthcare costs (inpatient and specialised outpatient healthcare as well as pharmacy-dispensed prescribed drugs) and costs of productivity loss (days with sickness absence and disability pension) were estimated between the people with MS and references using t tests with 95% confidence intervals. The average excess costs of MS were estimated using generalised estimating equation models.

RESULTS: People with multiple sclerosis had higher costs before the diagnosis of MS and also thereafter. The mean differences in healthcare costs and productivity losses between the people with MS and matched references in Y_-4 were 216 EUR (95% confidence interval 58-374) and 1540 EUR (95% confidence interval 848-2233), with larger cost excesses observed in later study years. Summarising the 9 study years, people with MS had fivefold higher excess healthcare costs than references, and more than twice as high productivity losses.

CONCLUSIONS: Excess healthcare costs and productivity losses occur already before the diagnosis of MS and increase with time. The excess costs findings before diagnosis could suggest that an earlier diagnosis might lead to reduced excess costs of MS over time.

Aims Little is known regarding how the risk of suicide in refugees relates to their host country. Specifically, to what extent inter-country differences in structural factors between the host countries may explain the association between refugee status and subsequent suicide is lacking in previous literature. We aimed to investigate (1) the risk of suicide in refugees resident in Sweden and Norway, in general, and according to their sex, age, region/country of birth and duration of residence, compared with the risk of suicide in the respective majority host population; (2) if factors related to socio-demographics, labour market marginalisation (LMM) and healthcare use might explain the risk of suicide in refugees differently in host countries. Methods Using a nested case-control design, each case who died by suicide between the age of 18 and 64 years during 1998 and 2018 (17 572 and 9443 cases in Sweden and Norway, respectively) was matched with up to 20 controls from the general population, by sex and age. Multivariate-adjusted conditional logistic regression models yielding adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to test the association between refugee status and suicide. Separate models were controlled for factors related to socio-demographics, previous LMM and healthcare use. Analyses were also stratified by sex and age groups, by refugees' region/country of birth and duration of residence in the host country. Results The aORs for suicide in refugees in Sweden and Norway were 0.5 (95% CI 0.5-0.6) and 0.3 (95% CI 0.3-0.4), compared with the Swedish-born and Norwegian-born individuals, respectively. Stratification by region/country of birth showed similar statistically significant lower odds for most refugee groups in both host countries except for refugees from Eritrea (aOR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.6) in Sweden. The risk of suicide did not vary much across refugee groups by their duration of residence, sex and age except for younger refugees aged 18-24 who did not have a statistically significant relative difference in suicide risk than their respective host country peers. Factors related to socio-demographics, LMM and healthcare use had only a marginal influence on the studied associations in both countries. Conclusions Refugees in Sweden and Norway had almost similar suicide mortality advantages compared with the Swedish-born and Norwegian-born population, respectively. These findings may suggest that resiliency and culture/religion-bound attitudes towards suicidal behaviour in refugees could be more influential for their suicide risk after resettlement than other post-migration environmental and structural factors in the host country.